"The issue many forget is that "learning" is not one thing…it is a multi-layered word that tends to get treated as if it was just one thing…and it's not. It is multi-facetted and that is why developing new models for "learning" is so difficult…there are too many levels for one school of thought or one model to do it all. (Kerr, 2007)
I think ultimately, this conclusion that Kerr has drawn is appropriate. There cannot simply be one school of thought that trumps them all. However, if given the need to point out the most important learning theory, then I do feel that Cognitivism is the underlying root of all the -isms. I believe this to be true because of the use of the brain. The brain tells us to think and how to think. The brain tells us to do and how to do. Even in acting out a learning process, there must be thought about how to do it, when to do it, how fast to do it, etc. One does not simply dive in and do something with the expectations of a successful outcome. There must be a thought process in the "doing" whether it is consciously or subconsciously. One of Kapp's responses was as follows, "I really believe that is the essence of good educational design. Creating learning utilizing an entire tool kit of philosophies, techniques and ideas." (Kapp, 2007)
Additional sites of interest are as follows:
Cognitivism and Constructivism http://www.coe.fau.edu/faculty/cafolla/courses/eme6051/Cognitivism.htm, and
Schema theory of learning
http://www.sil.org/lingualinks/literacy/ImplementALiteracyProgram/SchemaTheoryofLearning.htm
Stevenson, C. (2010, January). Learning Theory: Cognitivism (Blog). Retrieved March 29, 2010, from Laying an Instructional Foundation: http://onstoptrainer.blogspot.com/2010/01/learning-theory-cognitivism.html